This op-ed was published by the Gazette-Times (Corvallis, Oregon) on June 30, 2004. I am posting it here because that website may no longer be accessible by non-subscribers.
***********************
The
Chinese Communist leader Mao Tse-Tung once observed that, "There is
nothing as practical as a good theory." Unfortunately for China, he didn't have one. Even more unfortunately, Americans
don't have one, either. (Just because we correctly disagreed with Mao's
perverse principles doesn't mean that ours are correct. It is possible for both
sides of a disagreement to be wrong.)
The
fundamental error in U.S. political doctrine is our assumption¸ never adequately
examined, that nations and "peoples" ought to have a right to
independence and "self-determination." Although this principle was
best articulated by President Woodrow Wilson during World War I, its roots go
clear back to the Declaration of Independence and the subsequent war by which
we tore ourselves loose from British rule.
The
problem with a claimed right of self-determination is that government isn't
like that. Political philosophers have long understood that the essence of
government is its power to impose sanctions on people, the power in the
inspired language of the Constitution to deprive people of life, liberty or
property. Since nobody will consent to a transaction in which they are to be
executed, imprisoned, or fined, our basic relationship with government is an
involuntary association, not a voluntary one.
St.
Thomas Aquinas was pointing out this unpleasant fact about government when he
noted that "Taking away justice, then, what is government but a great
robber band?" Everybody understands that the relationship between a robber
and his victim is an involuntary association. Even Mao Tse-tung, who being
merely human could not always manage to be wrong, got something right when he
observed that "All political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."
It is
perverse to claim a right to voluntarily select the people with whom we are
going to be involuntarily associated. Any foreign policy based on such a belief
cannot help but confuse and disorient us and our leaders. And it throws us
seriously off-balance when we are dealing with terrorists.
It is
often said that organizations like the PLO, the ETA (Basque separatists in Spain), the IRA (Catholic separatists in Northern Ireland), the Chechen separatists in Russia, etc., are pursuing legitimate goals with illegitimate
means. This is incorrect. These organizations are pursuing illegitimate goals -
national independence - with illegitimate means - terrorism.
The
people for whom these organizations claim to speak may indeed have legitimate
grievances. But if they are being singled out for unjust treatment by the governments
they are currently under, the proper remedy is to demand that they be treated
equally under the law along with everyone else in their country, not that they
be allowed to go their own way.
Americans
have seen how well this reformist approach works. Black people in America historically suffered from intolerable injustices, but
mainstream black leaders correctly resisted the bad precedent set by the
Declaration of Independence and demanded equality before the law rather than
separation.
It may
take Americans some time to recognize that my argument is a correct one.
Understanding this will not be easy for people whose principal political
holiday is Independence Day!
Of
course, it is too late now to repudiate the Declaration of Independence and
submit once again to British rule. But the vigor with which the United States stomped on the attempt by its southern states to secede
implicitly admitted that we recognize no right to self-determination when it is
directed against our own government. It is high time that we explicitly admit
that our revolution was a mistake, and stop condoning efforts to secede from
other countries, too.
******************
Paul F. deLespinasse of Corvallis is a retired professor of political science from Adrian
College in Michigan. His e-mail address is pdeles@proaxis.com
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are e-mailed to me. I will post excerpts from those I think will most interest readers.