Thursday, April 28, 2022

Brief bio of Paul F. deLespinasse

 

Paul F. deLespinasse is Professor Emeritus of Political Science and Computer Science at Adrian College. He received his Ph.D. from Johns Hopkins University in 1966, and has been a National Merit Scholar, an NDEA Fellow, a Woodrow Wilson Fellow, and a Fellow in Law and Political Science at the Harvard Law School. His college textbook, "Thinking About Politics: American Government in Associational Perspective," was published in 1981 and his most recent book is "Beyond Capitalism: A Classless Society With (Mostly) Free Markets." His columns have appeared in newspapers in Michigan, Oregon, and a number of other states. He read Правда, the Russian Communist Party daily newspaper, as part of his work for 29 years.

Sunday, February 20, 2022

Incorrect translation of Vladimir Putin's "geopolitical catastrophe" statement

 

The official Russian government translation of Putin’s remark:

“Above all, we should acknowledge that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster of the century.”

Putin’s remark in the original Russian language (with the source in the following url):

Прежде всего следует признать, что крушение Советского Союза было крупнейшей геополитической катастрофой века.

http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_53088/

The Russian language does not have words for “a” and “the.”   Whether a speaker has said “a book” or “the book” must therefore be determined by context.   

The word   крупнейшей  is in the grammatical form that  Russian experts call a “simple superlative.”  As a leading textbook notes,  “The simple superlative does not show comparison, but rather indicates a high degree of the given quality.”  That is why the correct translation is “a major catastrophe” rather than “the greatest” catastrophe".  Putin clearly therefore did not say the Soviet collapse was “the greatest” geopolitical catastrophe.

There are enough troubling things about Mr. Putin’s recent behavior that there is no need to exaggerate, let alone to seriously mistranslate, things that he has said. Unfortunately,  when one googles the alternate translations, the incorrect ones outweigh the correct ones by ten to one!  This is probably because most people who quote Putin do not see the original Russian and probably do not speak Russian or don't speak it very well.


Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Real Life: Far More Complicated Than Any Game

 According to Wikipedia, "Game theory is the study of mathematical models of strategic interactions among rational agents."

Game theory has only limited usefulness for social scientists because society consists of many games, not just one, and these games interact with each other. The world is much more complicated than any single game.

Decades ago, I tried to make chess more like society, converting it into a more complicated game than it already is. On an ocean liner between Honolulu and San Francisco, I was accosted by guy who wanted to play chess. When I informed him that I was not a strong player, he claimed he wasn't either. He lied.

He clobbered me, having memorized standard approaches to chess moves. Mortified, I invented a chess version to force people like him to live by their wits, like I have to.

Flexichess begins like regular chess. But instead of moving a piece players can, within a few limits, change a rule, altering the whole balance of forces on the chessboard. No one can predict how rules will be changed, throwing rascals like my steamship companion off balance.

Later, I converted Flexichess into a team sport, Perplexichess. Teams consisting of 7 players play Flexichess on seven boards. On top of this a team's eighth member---a grand strategist---can move pieces to the same location on another board if it is unoccupied, without taking turns with the other grand strategist!. The grand strategist's goal is to win a majority of the boards.

Board players, playing Flexichess rationally, may be defeated because their team's grand strategist sacrificed their board by moving key pieces to a board where they were worth more.

Since it has many games going on simultaneously at two different levels, Perplexichess is very complicated. But it is still much less complicated than human societies are.

The world is made up of a vast number of different "games" simultaneously played by seven billion people. The main game many people play, especially in poor countries or among poorer people in rich countries, simply seeks physical survival.

Other people may be playing romantic games. And there are an endless number of games played by individuals in corporations, labor unions, churches, schools and universities, interest groups, hospitals, and charitable organizations.

Most individuals are playing several different games.

At a still higher level we find games played by politicians seeking appointment or election to high government positions.

The winners in these political games find themselves in games at a still higher level, seeking to protect themselves from challengers. While they remain in power, many of them may seek to advantage their own glory and their government at the expense of others, sometimes even getting their countries into wars.

As in Perplexichess, the games played at a higher level of society can throw the games of people playing at a lower level into total chaos. For example, a student planning to become a scientist might be drafted to fight a war in some country with which he (or she, in some countries) has no connection, concern, or knowledge.

On 9-11 many financial executives working in the Twin Towers found their professional games, and their lives, undone by a game played by the fanatics who crashed hijacked airliners into their buildings.

Lower level games can also confound those playing higher level games. National leaders attempting to minimize injuries caused by Covid have been frustrated by games played by governors, political opportunists, and foreign enemies who injected divisive social media memes into our society.

No wonder it is nearly impossible to predict what is going to happen next! And the complexity caused by the interactions of multiple games also makes it difficult to understand what has already gone on, creating opportunities for crazy conspiracy theories to catch on.

A conspiracy theory can be simple and consistent, whereas reality is often messy.






Monday, January 10, 2022

Bad translation of Vladimir Putin's "geopolitical catastrophe" statement


Putin did NOT say that the collapse of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century.

 The official Russian government translation of Putin’s remark:

“Above all, we should acknowledge that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster of the century.”  (Emphasis added.  P.deL.)

Putin’s remark in the original Russian language (with the source in the following url):

Прежде всего следует признать, что крушение Советского Союза было крупнейшей геополитической катастрофой века.

http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_53088/

The Russian language does not have words for “a” and “the.”   Whether a speaker has said “a book” or “the book” must therefore be determined by context.   

The word   крупнейшей  is in the grammatical form that  Russian experts call a “simple superlative.”  As a leading textbook notes,  “The simple superlative does not show comparison, but rather indicates a high degree of the given quality.”  That is why the correct translation is “a major catastrophe” rather than “the greatest” catastrophe".  Putin clearly therefore did not say the Soviet collapse was “the greatest” geopolitical catastrophe.

There are enough troubling things about Mr. Putin’s recent behavior that there is no need to exaggerate, let alone to seriously mistranslate, things that he has said. Unfortunately,  when one googles the alternate translations, the incorrect ones outweigh the correct ones by ten to one!  This is probably because most people who quote Putin do not see the original Russian and probably do not speak Russian or don't speak it very well.


Wednesday, December 29, 2021

How Kofi Annan Can Stop The War

 

Published on Tuesday, March 11, 2003 by CommonDreams.org

How Kofi Annan Can Stop the War

by Paul F. deLespinasse

According to recent reports, the United States may be about to warn
the U.N. inspectors and reporters to leave Iraq within three days. The purpose
of this warning will be to protect the inspectors and reporters from harm when
U.S. forces attack Iraq, perhaps late next week.

The situation provides an interesting opportunity for U.N. Secretary
General Kofi Annan. If the U.S. issues the expected warning, he can and should
announce that the U.S. has no authority to evict the inspectors, who  are
United Nations employees. Furthermore, Annan can say that he will not withdraw
the inspectors from Iraq unless he is ordered to do so by the U.N. Security
Council or the inspectors report that they are not being allowed to do their job.

Any effort to get the Security Council to order the inspectors out
under current circumstances would undoubtedly fail, and if by some miracle it did
get the needed nine votes it would certainly be vetoed by France, Russia, or China.

Such an announcement by the Secretary General would have three very beneficial
consequences. First, it is unlikely that President Bush and his advisors would     
proceed with an attack, which would be a public relations nightmare as long as
the inspectors are still in Iraq.

Second, the announcement would not undermine the work of the
inspectors, but could even increase their clout, and that of the Secretary General,
vis-à-vis Saddam Hussein. As long as they remain, the inspectors would protect Iraq
from an American attack, but if not given carte blanche to do their work they will
leave.

Third, the announcement would become a precedent for greatly enhanced power to be 
exercised by the Secretary General of the United Nations. This person is the closest 
thing we have to a chief executive for the world, and he is in a position from which
it is natural to consider the welfare of the people of the world as a whole.

Until now, the veto power enjoyed by the five permanent members of the
Security Council (U.S., Great Britain, France, Russia, and China) has
generally been considered to be a limit on the power of the United
Nations. However by assuming the power to act on behalf of the human race
unless the Security Council tells him he cannot, the Secretary General can make
the veto work to increase his own power, and thus the power of the United Nations.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if today's tragic world conditions provided the opening for a 
great leap forward in our world institutions! If he
seizes the opportunity fate has given him, Kofi Annan may well go down in history
as a  "Machiavelli for peace," one of the greatest people of the twenty first
century.

And it will be the Bush Administration that made it all possible!
**************************************

Paul F. deLespinasse is professor emeritus of political science at
Adrian
College in Michigan. He can be reached at pdeles@proaxis.com