tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3147241978617143205.post1962168890788278884..comments2022-10-18T11:53:55.337-07:00Comments on Music, bicycling, politics . . .and a little science: Supreme Court Should Overturn State Establishment Clause CasesPaul F. deLespinassehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06032931702918183415noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3147241978617143205.post-57191983983757129072010-10-22T07:55:16.141-07:002010-10-22T07:55:16.141-07:00Good question. There was not room in the necessar...Good question. There was not room in the necessarily short article for the reference I originally had in it to Yale Law School professor Akhil Reed Amar's book, The Bill of Rights (Yale University Press, 1998), pp. 32-42. Professor Amar is probably the leading expert on the Bill of Rights, and he is most clear on this point. I did not get the idea from him, though, and he is not unique Paul F. deLespinassehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06032931702918183415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3147241978617143205.post-66364811172551789632010-10-22T06:05:33.711-07:002010-10-22T06:05:33.711-07:00I posted a link to this in a comment on David Frie...I posted a link to this in a comment on David Friedman's blog, where I think he oversimplified the issue.<br /><br />https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19727420&postID=7623499005420865764<br /><br />What is your source for the statement that the founders intended to preserve the ability of states to establish religions? I've never heard that from anyone but you. (But it's Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02783795002756491149noreply@blogger.com